USPTO serial 73742768
DUKES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KULICK, LIZBETH B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DUKES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRUCE E. O'CONNOR
CHRISTENSEN, O'CONNOR JOHNSON & KINDNESS2800 PACIFIC FIRST CTR1420 FIFTH AVESEATTLE, WA 98101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | RESTAURANT SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 1991 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 5, 1991 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 5, 1991 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 1, 1990 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 1, 1990 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 9, 1990 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 1990 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 17, 1990 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 11, 1989 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 30, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |