USPTO serial 73743913
HAITAI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HAITAI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH A. KOLASCH
JOSEPH A KOLASCH BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH AND BIRCH301 N WASHINGTON STP O BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22046-0747Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | COFFEE, TEA, COCOA, SUGAR, RICE, TAPIOCA, SAGO, COFFEE SUBSTITUTES, FLOUR, BREAD, BISCUITS, CAKES, PASTRY, FLAVORED ICES, HONEY, TREACLE, YEAST, BAKING POWDER, SALT, MUSTARD, PEPPER, VINEGAR, SAUCES EXCLUDING CRANBERRY AND APPLE SAUCE, SPICES, ICE CHEWING GUM, GINSENG CAND, AND DUMPLING | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 2, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |