Drawing for FANTASY F/X

USPTO serial 73744017

FANTASY F/X

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAMILTON, MICHAEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FANTASY F/X?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PHILIP FURGANG, ESQ.

PHILIP FURGANG ESQ2 CROSFIELD AVE STE 210WEST NYACK, NY 10994UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003COSMETICSABANDONEDJul 11, 1988

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 23, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 12, 1991ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 12, 1991EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 16, 1990CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 28, 1990ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 2, 1990JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 2, 1990EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 14, 1989UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 1989UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 1989UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 1989CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 16, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance