USPTO serial 73744126
S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HEINZ DAWID
HEINZ DAWID WEISS DAWID FROSS ZELNICK & LEHRMAN633 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-6703UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | PRECIOUS METALS AND THEIR ALLOYS, GOODS IN PRECIOUS METALS OR COATED THEREWITH, NAMELY, NECKLACES, EARRINGS, PINS, BRACELETS, BELT BUCKLES, RINGS, AMULETS, ASH TRAYS, BADGES, CIGAR BOXES, NEEDLE-BOXES, CANDLE RINGS AND CANDLESTICKS, CIGARETTE-CASES, WATCH-CHAINS, FIGURINES, EGG CUPS, GOBLETS, GOLD THREAD, MATCH HOLDERS, VASES, MEDALS, MEDALLIONS, NAPKIN RINGS; JEWELRY, PRECIOUS STONES, WATCHES, CLOCKS, CLOCKWORKS, WATCH CHAINS | ABANDONED | — |
| 018 | GOODS MADE OF LEATHER AND IMITATIONS OF LEATHER, NAMELY, HANDBAGS, TRAVELLING BAGS, SHOPPING BAGS, CARRY-ALL BAGS, SCHOOL BAGS, BEACH BAGS, BRIEFCASES, POCHETTES, KEY CASES, BUSINESS AND CREDIT CARD HOLDERS, WALLETS, PURSES, KEY RINGS, POCKET WALLETS, STRING POUCHES, TRAVELLING TRUNKS, LUGGAGE; UMBRELLAS, PARASOLS AND WALKING STICKS, WHIPS, HARNESS | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | BELTS (CLOTHING), SCARVES, STOLES, RUFFLED SHAWLS, BOAS, CAPS, HATS, SLIPPERS, SHOES, BOOTS, SANDALS, PANTS, TROUSERS, ROBES, SUITS, BRASSIERES, CHASUBLES, CORSETS, FUR-LINED COATS, FUR COATS, GARBARDINES, OVERCOATS, COATS, RAINCOATS, GLOVES, JACKETS, KNITTED SHAWLS, SCARVES, STOLES, CARDIGANS, COATS, TROUSERS, SKIRTS, DRESSES AND HATS, LAYETTES, NECKTIES, OVERALLS, PULLOVERS, PAJAMAS, SHIRTS, SOCKS, UNDERWEAR, UNIFORMS, VESTS, SWIMSUITS, SWEATERS, DRESSING GOWNS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 10, 1991 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 10, 1991 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 29, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 23, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 23, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 21, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |