USPTO serial 73744875
HEADLINERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HANNON, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HEADLINERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ASHFORD, MIDDLESEX, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD R. WEINGRAM
EDWARD R WEINGRAM RTE 4WEINGRAM & ZALLE 210PARAMUS, NJ 07652Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 022 | GARMENT BAG FOR STORAGE, NAMLEY, SHAMS FOR HOLDING CLOTHING AND BEDDING | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 8, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |