USPTO serial 73747312
HITOMI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HITOMI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SABAE-SHI, FUKUI-KEN, JP
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | EYEGLASS FRAMES; SUNGLASSES; CONTACT LENSES; EYEGLASS LENSES; EYEGLASS CASES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 1991 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 8, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |