USPTO serial 73748208
NITE GLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SZOKE, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NITE GLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
RINGWOOD, VICTORIA 3134, AU
RINGWOOD, VICTORIA 3134, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FRED W. HATHAWAY
FRED W HATHAWAY VENABLE, BAETJER, HOWARD & CIVILETTI1201 NEW YORK AVE NW STE 1000WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | PACIFIERS (INCLUDING TEETHING RINGS) FOR BABIES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 23, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 22, 1992 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 17, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 16, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 3, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |