Drawing for GOLDEN NUGGET

USPTO serial 73749963

GOLDEN NUGGET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
APPLEWHITE, FRANCINE L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOLDEN NUGGET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT J. SCHAAP

ROBERT J SCHAAP6820 LA TIJERA BLVDSTE 107LOS ANGELES, CA 90045

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031UNPROCESSED NUTSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 17, 1991ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Sep 4, 1990PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 9, 1990NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 6, 1990NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 14, 1990CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 14, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 1, 1990EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 1, 1990EXDMEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT—
Mar 16, 1990CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 12, 1989EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 25, 1989CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 6, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance