USPTO serial 73750264
TV DINER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TV DINER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TORONTO, CANADA, CA
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TV DINER, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TV DINER
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1990 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 1989 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |