USPTO serial 73750729
THE E-Z CHAIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE E-Z CHAIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
DOWNSVIEW, ONTARIO M3J 2M6, CA
DOWNSVIEW, ONTARIO M3J 2M6, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | OFFICE FURNITURE; NAMELY, CHAIRS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 29, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 29, 1993 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 9, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 24, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 21, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 1991 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 1991 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |