USPTO serial 73752016
RATT'L SPOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COHN, DEBBIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RATT'L SPOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | FISHING LURES | ABANDONED | May 15, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 22, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 22, 1992 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 19, 1989 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 11, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 11, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 4, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |