USPTO serial 73752255
RUMBA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 9, 1990
- Examiner
- BYERS, KRISTEN S.
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with RUMBA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Egbert
John S. Egbert Egbert, McDaniel & Swartz, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Suite 1250Houston, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERFUMERY PRODUCTS, namely, PERFUMES, TOILET WATER; [ BEAUTY PRODUCTS, namely, ROUGE, EYE SHADOW, BASE MAKE-UP, FACE AND BEAUTY MASKS, LIPSTICKS, NAIL POLISHES AND REMOVERS, LOTIONS, CREAMS AND OTHER MAKE-UP REMOVERS] TOILET PRODUCTS, NAMELY[ SHAMPOOS, BATH SALTS ], BATH AND SHOWER GEL,[ BUBBLE BATHS,] TOILET SOAPS; [ ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE; HAIR LOTIONS; SHAVING SOAPS, CREAMS AND FOAMS;][ AFTER-SHAVE LOTIONS AND BALMS; TOOTHPASTES; TANNING PRODUCTS, namely, SOLAR OILS, MILKS, LOTIONS AND CREAMS, SELF-TANNING CREAMS, SKIN-TANNING LOTIONS; NON-MEDICAL PREPARATIONS FOR SKIN AND FACE CARE, namely, NON-MEDICAL VITALIZING AND TONING LOTIONS AND CREAMS], MOISTURIZING [ LOTIONS AND ] CREAMS, [ GRANULATED CREAMS, DEODORANTS FOR PERSONAL USE] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BALENCIAGA S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by BALENCIAGA S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by PARFUMS TED LAPIDUS
- Other trademarks owned by BALENCIAGA S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named RUMBA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | RNL3 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (THIRD RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 11, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 9, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2010 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 21, 2010 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 19, 2010 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2000 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 15, 2000 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 13, 1999 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1996 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 21, 1995 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 1990 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 17, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 16, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 31, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |