USPTO serial 73753043
MPC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MPC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES M. MARMELSTEIN
CHARLES M MARMELSTEIN ARMSTRONG, NIKAIDO, ET ALSTE 9121725 K ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | AIR COMPRESSORS AND PNEUMATIC EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, AIR SANDERS, AIR HAMMERS, AIR SCRAPERS, AIR RIVETTING HAMMERS, AIR CHIPPING HAMMERS, AIR NEEDLE SCALERS, AIR RACKET WRENCHES, AIR IMPACT WRENCHES, AIR SPRAY GUNS, LUBRICATORS, AIR HOSES, AIR POLISHERS, AIR DIE GRINDERS, AIR GRINDERS, AIR METAL SHEARS, AIR NIBBLERS, AIR SAWS, AIR DRILLS, AIR UNDERCOATING GUNS, AIR POWERED CAULKING GUNS, AIR POWERED GREASE GUNS, AIR SANDBLASTING GUNS, AIR TIRE BUFFERS, AIR HYDRAULIC RIVETERS, AIR SCREWDRIVERS, AIR BODY SAWS/AIR CIRCULAR SAWS, AIR CUT-OFF TOOLS, AND AIR HYDRAULIC PUNCH IN FLANGE TOOLS | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |