USPTO serial 73753234
A AMPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with A AMPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STANLEY R. MOORE
STANLEY R MOORE JOHNSON & SWANSON100 FOUNDERS SQ900 JACKSON STDALLAS, TX 75202-4499Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND INSTALLATION SERVICES OF TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT; OPTICAL READERS, MAGNETIC READERS AND PRINTERS; ALARM UNITS; COMPUTERS AND AUTOMATED CONTROL UNITS FOR COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 1992 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 22, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 1992 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 21, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 4, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |