USPTO serial 73754217
AISMALIBAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KURZBARD, MYRA K.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AISMALIBAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD R. SCHWARTZ
EDWARD R SCHWARTZ WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, PC600 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02210-2211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRICAL WINDING WIRES, CONDUCTORS AND CABLES AND FIBEROPTIC CABLES | ABANDONED | — |
| 017 | ELECTRICAL INSULATING MATERIALS, NAMELY, INSULATING VARNISHES AND RESINS FOR THE TREATMENT OF COILS, INSULATING LAMINATES IN SHEET FORM, INSULATING TUBES AND CYLINDERS, SHAPED AND MOULDED PARTS, MACHINE AND STAMPED PARTS, FLEXIBLE INSULATING MATERIAL AND MICA PAPER | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 1991 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 29, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 12, 1991 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 31, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 30, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |