USPTO serial 73754327
MICROTEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERSKINE KATHRYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MICROTEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CELLULAR PORTABLE TELEPHONES AND PAPERS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 1991 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 2, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 13, 1991 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 15, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 13, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 13, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 30, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |