USPTO serial 73754384
THE KNOW WHY COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE KNOW WHY COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TESTING EQUIPMENT FOR USE IN THE PAPER MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY, NAMELY VIBRATION SENSORS, VACUUM SENSORS, INDUCTIVE AND OPTICAL TRIGGERING DEVICES, PAPER QUALITY ANALYZING UNITS, AND COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR MONITORING PAPER PRODUCTION PLANS | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | PROVIDING EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY COURSES AND DISSEMINATING INFORMATION IN THE USE OF OPERATING OF TECHNICAL SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS IN THE PAPER MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |