Drawing for EGG N' MUFFIN

USPTO serial 73757038

EGG N' MUFFIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1603228Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 19, 1990
Examiner
DEMOS, JOHN C., JR.
Law office
FILE DESTROYED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EGG N' MUFFIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E. LAUBSCHER, SR.

LAWRENCE E LAUBSCHER SR LAUBSCHER, PRESTA & LAUBSCHER745 S 23RD STARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030BREAKFAST SANDWICHSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDSep 1, 1988

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 26, 1991C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Dec 10, 1990C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Jun 19, 1990R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Mar 23, 1990CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Mar 23, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 24, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 1989CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 30, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance