USPTO serial 73757374
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DOUGLAS D. HOLTHAUS, ESQ.
DOUGLAS D HOLTHAUS ESQ ADKINS, FUHRMAN & HOLTHAUS1058 TWENTY-FIRST STSAN DIEGO, CA 92102UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | ORAL SPRAY OF VITAMINS | ABANDONED | Sep 1, 1988 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 1990 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 23, 1990 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 23, 1990 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 18, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 9, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |