Drawing for BECO

USPTO serial 73757517

BECO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WILLIAMS, IRENE
Law office
OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BECO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM R. GUSTAVSON

WILLIAM R GUSTAVSON SIDLEY & AUSTIN717 N HARWOOD, STE 3400DALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009SERVICES FOR SELECTION AND APPLICATION OF THREE PHASE INDUCTION ELECTRIC MOTORSACTIVESep 15, 1988

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 20, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Sep 26, 1990ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Sep 26, 1990EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Jul 16, 1990CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Mar 9, 1990EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Aug 4, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 8, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance