Drawing for MASTER FENCER

USPTO serial 73758263

MASTER FENCER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, SUSAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MASTER FENCER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE REZAC & SCHWAB708 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041ENTERTAINMENT AND EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY - ORGANIZATION AND CONDUCTING FENCING CHAMPIONSHIPS AND TEACHING PROGRAMSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 1992ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 17, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 14, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 6, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 1989UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 1989CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 14, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance