USPTO serial 73758409
CURTAINSIDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CURTAINSIDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ANCASTER, ONTARIO, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | TRAILER AND TRUCK BODIES; TRAILERS; AND PARTS/ACCESSORIES FOR TRUCKS AND TRAILERS, NAMELY LOAD RESTRAINERS AND STAKE AND RACK KITS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 1991 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 1990 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |