USPTO serial 73759192
DOMAINE SANTA ANA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HINES PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DOMAINE SANTA ANA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
33000 BORDEAUX, FR
33000 BORDEAUX, FR
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | WINES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 29, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 17, 1992 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 4, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 29, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 31, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 1990 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 1990 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |