Drawing for DIEGO DELLA VALLE DV

USPTO serial 73760183

DIEGO DELLA VALLE DV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1586765Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 13, 1990
Examiner
CROWE, ROBERT J.
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIEGO DELLA VALLE DV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018SMALL LEATHER GOODS, NAMELY, POCKET BOOKS, KEY CASES, PURSES, AND BAGS, NAMELY, TOTE BAGS, TRAVEL BAGS, HANDBAGSEXPIRED
025BELTS, SHOES AND FOOTWEAREXPIRED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 11, 2011CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9
Dec 5, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Nov 10, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 10, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 9, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 16, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 15, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 2, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 15, 2000RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Dec 15, 200089AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Apr 7, 200089AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED
Feb 8, 1996C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jun 7, 1995815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED
Mar 13, 1990R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 19, 1989PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 19, 1989PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 18, 1989NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 28, 1989CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 26, 1989CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Sep 11, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 31, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 1989ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jun 16, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 29, 1988CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Dec 20, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance