USPTO serial 73761060
SYNCHRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CONN, WILLIAM A.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SYNCHRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONALD R. BAHR
DONALD R BAHR SPALDING & EVENFLO COMPANIES, INC5750-A NORTHY HOOVER BLVDTAMPA, FL 33634UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | SQUASH RACKETS | ABANDONED | Aug 29, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LISCO, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SPALDING & EVENFLO COMPANIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SPALDING & EVENFLO COMPANIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named SYNCHRO
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 27, 1989 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 25, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 18, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |