USPTO serial 73761264
GIMBORN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMILTON, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GIMBORN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES GUTTMAN
CHARLES GUTTMAN MARMOREK, GUTTMAN & RUBENSTEIN330 SEVENTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL, VETERINARY AND SANITARY PREPARATIONS AND DESINFECTANTS, PREPARATIONS FOR DESTROYING VERMIN, ALL GOODS FOR ANIMALS | ABANDONED | — |
| 018 | LEATHER AND IMITATIONS OF LEATHER, AND GOODS MADE OF THESE MATERIALS INCLUDED, ESPECIALLY DOG AND CAT COLLARS, DOG AND CAT LEADS, ANIMAL MUZZLES DOG AND CAT COLLARS AND DOG AND CAT LEADS MADE OF METALHOUSING FOR ANIMALS MADE OF WOOD, REED, CANE, WICKER OR TEXTILES | ABANDONED | — |
| 031 | AGRICULTRUAL, HORTICULTURAL AND FORESTRY PRODUCTS AND GRAINS AND FOODSTAFFS FOR ANIMALS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |