USPTO serial 73761303
ASCAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PESKA, KEVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ASCAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
V. M. CREEDON
V M CREEDON WENDEROTH, LIND & PONACKSOUTHERN BLDG STE 700805 FIFTEENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CAPACITORS, FACSIMILE MACHINES, TELEPRINTER DATA EXCHANGE TERMINALS, AND PARTS THEREOF | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 6, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 6, 1996 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 29, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 27, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 29, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 28, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |