USPTO serial 73761635
MMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
GUELPH, ONTARIO, CA
GUELPH, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DARYL W. SCHNURR
DARYL W SCHNURRP O BOX 260718 WEBER ST WKITCHENER, ON N2H 6N2Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR MEDIA MANAGEMENT SERVICES OFFERED TO EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS, CHURCHES AND LIBRARIES; NAMELY, A CATALOGUING AND BOOKING SYSTEM FOR LEARNING MATERIALS INCLUDING AN EQUIPMENT INVENTORY SYSTEM AND A MAINTENANCE MODULE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 15, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 15, 1992 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 30, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 22, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 20, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 7, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 22, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |