USPTO serial 73761653
TRIVIA POKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRIVIA POKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LONDON, ONTARIO, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PROMOTIONAL GAME MATERIALS - NAMELY, PAPER SHEETS, CARDS, PASTE BOARDS WITH ERASEABLE OR REMOVABLE PANELS TO EXPOSE ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 1989 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 22, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1989 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |