USPTO serial 73761943
X EXTENSOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITAKER, LAURIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with X EXTENSOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
GOTHENBURG, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWIN E. GREIGG
EDWIN E GREIGG727 23RD ST SSTE 220ARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | MARINE PAINTS, VARNISHES, COATINGS, LACQUERS AND ANTI-FOULING COMPOSITIONS; MARINE PAINT AND VARNISH DRYERS AND THINNERS; MARINE WOOD PRESERVATIVES AND STAINS; AND ANTI-CORROSIVE PAINT-TYPE COATINGS FOR MARINE USE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 1991 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |