USPTO serial 73762839
INNOVA TUF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INNOVA TUF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | GRAPHIC ARTS CONVERTING PAPER, PADDED PAPER, INSULATED PAPER IN SHEETS, ENVELOPES, X-RAY ENVELOPES, SEED ENVELOPES, COURIER ENVELOPES, FLOPPY DISC ENVELOPES, PADDED SHIPPING BAGS, SEED BAGS, COURIER BAGS, TICKET FOLDERS, FILE FOLDERS, LABELS AND PAPER SIGNS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BARBECON INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INNOVA ENVELOPE INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ABITIBI-PRICE INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INTER CITY PAPERS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named INNOVA TUF
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |