USPTO serial 73763016
PROFESSIONAL GRAPH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROFESSIONAL GRAPH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY A. DONOVAN
MARY A DONOVAN PROSKAUER ROSE GOETZ & MENDELSOHN1585 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR CREATING GRAPHS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |