Drawing for HRM RESOURCE

USPTO serial 73763028

HRM RESOURCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HRM RESOURCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

AGNES LEFAS DAUB

AGNES LEFAS DAUB BLAKE CASSELS & GRAYDONINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GROUPBOX 25, COMMERCE COURT WTORONTO, ON M5L 1A9

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT FOR CALCULATION, INPUT, STORAGE, CONVERSION, PROCESSING AND TRANSMISSION OF DATA, INFORMATION, SIGNALS OR IMAGES; COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER PERIPHERALS, COMPUTER PROGRAMS, SOFTWARE AND SOFTWARE PACKAGES USED IN THE AREA OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENTABANDONED—
042ELECTRONIC PROGRAMMING SERVICES AND COMPUTERIZED DATA PROCESSING SERVICES RELATING TO THE APPLICATION AND COMMERCIALIZATION OF INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 13, 1991PCDEPETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED—
Jun 14, 1990PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 23, 1990PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 1990ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 26, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance