USPTO serial 73763065
ULTRA/BOND 500
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1614508Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 25, 1990
- Examiner
- HAMILTON, MICHAEL
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ULTRA/BOND 500?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LAVAL, PROVINCE OF QUEBEC, CA
LAVAL, PROVINCE OF QUEBEC, CA
LAVAL, PROVINCE OF QUEBEC, CA
LAVAL, PROVINCE OF QUEBEC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JESS M. COLLEN
JESS M COLLEN COLLEN LAW ASSOCIATES PCBOX 306 SCARBOROUGH STATIONSCARBOROUGH, NY 10510-0806UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | HIGHLY TACKIFIED MASTIC FOR INSTALLATION OF VINYL OR RUBBER COVE BASE OVER MOST WALL SURFACES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MAPEI INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MAPEI CANADA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MAPEI CANADA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MAPEI CANADA INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named ULTRA/BOND 500
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 26, 2001 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 11, 2000 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 1996 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 29, 1995 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 1990 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 3, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 2, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1990 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 27, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 1989 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 1989 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |