USPTO serial 73763631
RUNNER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1623343Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 20, 1990
- Examiner
- BRUCE, MARY FRANCES
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RUNNER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MILAN, IT
MILAN, IT
MILAN, IT
20134 MILAN, IT
MILANO (MI), IT
MILAN, IT
MILAN, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael N. Mercanti
Michael N. Mercanti LUCAS & MERCANTI, LLP30 BROAD STREET, 21st FLOORNew York, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DIMENSIONALLY STABLE ELECTRODES FOR ELECTROLYTIC CELLS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 20, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DE NORA S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by DENORA ELETTRODI S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by DE NORA PERMELEC S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by DE NORA ELETTRODI S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by INDUSTRIE DE NORA S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by DE NORA PERMELEC S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by DE NORA PERMELEC S.P.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named RUNNER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 20, 2010 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 20, 2010 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 20, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 22, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2001 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 22, 2001 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 9, 2000 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| May 31, 1997 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 12, 1997 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Jan 22, 1997 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Jan 17, 1997 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Nov 19, 1996 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 1990 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 28, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 31, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 10, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 17, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 31, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |