USPTO serial 73763942
ELSENHAM COLLECTION 1890
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- APPLEWHITE, FRANCINE L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ELSENHAM COLLECTION 1890?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ELSENHAM QUALITY FOODS LIMITED
HERTFORDSHIRE CM22 6DT, GB
ELSENHAM QUALITY FOODS LIMITED
HERTFORDSHIRE CM22 6DT, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT V. VICKERS
ROBERT V VICKERS BODY, VICKERS & DANIELS2000 TERMINAL TWRCLEVELAND, OH 44113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | BISCUITS, PETITS FOURS, CAKES, SAUCES (EXCLUDING CRANBERRY AND APPLE SAUCE) MUSTARD AND CHUTNEY | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 29, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 13, 1994 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 13, 1994 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 13, 1994 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 20, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 22, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |