USPTO serial 73764032
CRISTAL SPRING WATER PURE BLACK HILLS MINERAL WATER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CRISTAL SPRING WATER PURE BLACK HILLS MINERAL WATER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ZUGERSTRASSE, CH
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | SPRING WATER OR MINERAL WATER | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 1992 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 27, 1991 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 15, 1991 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 6, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 1990 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 1990 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 9, 1990 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 23, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |