USPTO serial 73764924
BABYSPORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BABYSPORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
FARRACE & FARRACE ART & DESIGN
ETOBICOKE, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES L. KURTZ
JAMES L KURTZ EMRICH & DITHMARSTE 3000150 N WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING NAMELY, SWEATSHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, TANK TOPS, SWEATPANTS, SWEATSHORTS, SPORT SHIRTS, SOCKS, SCARVES, VESTS, JACKETS, SWEATERS, CAPS, HATS, GLOVES, SWIMWEAR, DRESSES, SKIRTS, JEANS, JEAN JACKETS, UNDERWEAR, LIGHT-WEIGHT RESISTANT JACKETS, RAINCOATS; BELTS, SUNVISORS, HEADBANDS, WRISTBANDS, AND TIES; AEROBIC WEAR NAMELY TIGHTS, BODYSUITS, LEOTARDS, SHORTS, WARM-UP SOCKS, AEROBIC SHOES, WRISTBANDS, HEADBANDS, SASH BELTS, WARM-UP SUITS AND UNDERWEAR; AND CHILDREN'S WEAR NAMELY SWEATSHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, SHORTS, SHIRTS, PANTS, TANK TOPS, DRESSES, JACKETS, COATS, UNDERWEAR, HATS AND GLOVES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |