USPTO serial 73765285
INFOMEDIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INFOMEDIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
EDMONTON, ALBERTA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ADRIENNE L. WHITE, ESQ.
ADRIENNE L WHITE ESQ BURNS, DOANE, SWECKER & MATHISWASHINGTON & PRINCE STSTHE GEORGE MASON BLDG P O BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND PROGRAM MANUALS ALL SOLD AS A UNIT FOR USE IN THE MEDICAL FIELD | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 1991 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |