Drawing for SUPERLIG

USPTO serial 73765986

SUPERLIG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
COFIELD, JULIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUPERLIG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001LIGNOSULPHONATE MODIFIED OR PURIFIED BY CHEMICAL TREATMENT FOR USE AS A DISPERSANT OR BINDERABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 1996ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Feb 12, 1996CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
May 16, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 25, 1993CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Sep 27, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 23, 1993CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Aug 25, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 14, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 23, 1992CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 2, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
May 28, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 1, 1990CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
May 11, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Mar 26, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 22, 1990CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Sep 25, 1989CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 13, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 22, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance