USPTO serial 73765986
SUPERLIG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COFIELD, JULIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPERLIG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TEMISCAMING, QUEBEC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES F. BROWN
JAMES F BROWN ROGERS & KILLEEN, PC510 KING STSTE 408ALEXANDRIA, VA 22315Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | LIGNOSULPHONATE MODIFIED OR PURIFIED BY CHEMICAL TREATMENT FOR USE AS A DISPERSANT OR BINDER | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 1996 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 28, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 11, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |