USPTO serial 73766757
AN/ANAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AN/ANAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ANAM ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.
BUK-KU, INCHEON, KR
Other trademarks owned by ANAM ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.
SEONGDONG-KU, SEOUL, KR
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | EQUIPMENT FOR RECORDING, TRANSMISSION OR REPRODUCTION OF SOUND OR IMAGES; NAMELY, RADIO RECEIVING SETS, TELEVISION RECEIVING SETS, SOUND RECORDERS, ELECTRONIC PHONOGRAPHS, RECORD PLAYERS, AUDIO TAPE RECORDERS, LOUD SPEAKER UNITS AND VIDEO TAPE RECORDERS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 25, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |