USPTO serial 73767335
GRACE CULINARY SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1589140Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 27, 1990
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GRACE CULINARY SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | PREPARED ENTREES, NAMELY MEAT, SEAFOOD, POULTRY, AND VEGETABLE ENTREES, PREPARED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES, MEATS, LUNCHEON MEATS, CHEESES, SOUPS, CHILI, AND SALAD DRESSINGS DIRECTED TO INSTITUTIONAL FOOD SERVICE DISTRIBUTORS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 18, 1988 |
| 030 | MARINADES DIRECTED TO INSTITUTIONAL FOOD SERVICE DISTRIBUTORS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 18, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GRACE CULINARY SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by W. R. GRACE & CO.-CONN.
- Other trademarks owned by W. R. GRACE & CO.-CONN.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named GRACE CULINARY SYSTEMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2001 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 1, 1996 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 20, 1995 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1990 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 29, 1990 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Jun 22, 1990 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Apr 23, 1990 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1990 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 2, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 2, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 3, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |