USPTO serial 73767870
TRANSOFOIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACK, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRANSOFOIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH S. LITTENBERG
JOSEPH S LITTENBERG LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG, ET AL600 S AVE WWESTFIELD, NJ 07090UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | NEWSPAPERS AND JOURNALS, BOOKS; BOOKBINDING MATERIAL; PHOTOGRAPHS; ADHESIVES FOR STATIONARY; ARTIST MATERIALS; PAINT BRUSHES, PLAYING CARDS; PRINTERS TYPE; PRINTING BLOCKS; PACKAGE ANPACKING MATERIAL OF PAPER AND HARD BOARD; AND BAGS OF PLASTIC FOR THE KEEPING OF PROVISIONS | ABANDONED | — |
| 017 | GUTTAPERKA, RUBBER, BALATA AND SUBSTITUTES HERETO AS WELL AS GOODS MADE FROM THESE MATERIALS ANNOT INCLUDED IN OTHER CLASSES; STOPPING-, PACKING- AND INSULATING MATERIALS; ASBESTOS, MECA AND PRODUCTS THEREFOR; NON METALIC TUBES; PLASTIC FOILES AND PLASTIC LAMINATES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 17, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |