USPTO serial 73768233
HUSH-A-BYE BABY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 25, 1991
- Examiner
- MOORHEAD CORA ANN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HUSH-A-BYE BABY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | DOLLS, DOLL CLOTHING AND DOLL ACCESSORIES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 1997 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 25, 1991 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 2, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 1, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 27, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 1990 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 1990 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |