USPTO serial 73768817
LASERART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LASERART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LPC LASER PROCESSING CENTRES LTD.
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DIRK J. GISEBURT
DIRK J GISEBURT DAVIS WRIGHT & JONES2600 CENTURY SQ1501 FOURTH AVESEATTLE, WA 98101-1688Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | DESK ACCESSORIES | ABANDONED | Jul 26, 1988 |
| 020 | DECORATIVE ITEMS OF WOOD, METAL, PLEXIGLASS AND OTHER MATERIALS, INCLUDING PLAQUES, NOVELTIES, GIFTWARE, SIGNS, CLOCKS, LIGHTS, KEY CHAINS AND FOBS | ABANDONED | Jul 26, 1988 |
| 040 | SERVICES OF LASER ENGRAVING ON WOOD, PLEXIGLASS, METAL AND OTHER MATERIALS AND LASER CUTTING OF THESE MATERIALS | ABANDONED | Jul 26, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 1990 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 23, 1990 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 5, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |