USPTO serial 73769088
FORVAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2196815Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 20, 1998
- Examiner
- SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FORVAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TOKYO, JP
TOKYO, JP
TOKYO, JP
SHIBUYA-KU, TOKYO, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James F. Mckeown
JAMES F MCKEOWN ANTONELLI, TERRY, STOUT & KRAUS1300 N SEVENTEENTH STSTE 1800ARLINGTON, VA 22209Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FORVAL CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by FORVAL CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by FORVAL CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SHIN-NIKON KOHAN CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named FORVAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2005 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 20, 1998 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 28, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 1989 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |