USPTO serial 73769466
AIRCELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AIRCELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CALGARY, ALBERTA, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CELLULAR AND TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, FULL DUPLEX BASE STATION TRANSCEIVERS, INCLUDING POWER SUPPLIES AND CUSTOMIZED AUDIO AND RADIO INTERFACES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 15, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 27, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |