USPTO serial 73769620
CHARIVARI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHARIVARI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MONTREAL, PROVINCE OF QUEBEC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MEYER A. GROSS, ESQ.
MEYER A GROSS ESQ SCHWEITZER CORNMAN & GROSSSTE 2200230 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10169Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRERECORDED VIDEO TAPES FEATURING TELEVISION PROGRAMS | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | COMMEMORATIVE GIFTS AND SOUVENIRS OF TELEVISION PROGRAMS NAMELY, PAPER BANNERS, PENCILS, MARKERS, BOND PAPER, CARDBOARD BOXES, NOTE-PAPER, ENVELOPES, NOTEBOOKS, ADDRESS BOOKS; PLAYING CARDS; DIARIES; AND BOOKS PERTAINING TO GAMES | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | GAMES AND RECREATIVE GOODS NAMELY BALLOONS, VIDEO GAME RECORDINGS, COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS, PARLOUR GAMES AND KITES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 16, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 16, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |