USPTO serial 73770059
ABSOLUTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COFIELD, JULIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ABSOLUTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD M. MOOSE
RICHARD M MOOSE DORITY AND MANNING700 E N STSTE 15GREENVILLE, SC 29601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | MULTI-PURPOSE CLEANING FLUIDS, NAMELY, ENZYME-BASED DETERGENT SOLUTIONS AND ACTIVATOR SOLUTIONS FOR GENERAL INDUSTRIAL USE | ABANDONED | Mar 15, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 1991 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 11, 1991 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 13, 1991 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 31, 1991 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 1990 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 30, 1990 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 21, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |