USPTO serial 73770598
BOUNCE-BACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SZOKE, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BOUNCE-BACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
DON MILLS, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DOUGLAS S. JOHNSON
DOUGLAS S JOHNSON DENNISON ASSOCIATES133 RICHMOND ST WSTE 301TORONTO, ON M5H 2L7Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PREPARATIONS TO BE INGESTED, OR OTHERWISE INTRODUCED INTO THE BODY, FOR REDUCING THE EFFECT OF ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION BY INCREASING THE METABOLIZATION OF ALCOHOL IN THE BODY AND/OR DECREASING THE ABSORPTION OF ALCOHOL IN THE BODY | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |